|
|
|
HOW
CAN THE POOREST COUNTRIES CATCH UP MORE QUICKLY? |
|
|
|
Growth
in living standards springs from the accumulation of
physical capital (investment) and human capital (labor),
and through advances in technology (what economists call
total factor productivity). Many factors can help or
hinder these processes. The experience of the countries
that have increased output most rapidly shows the
importance of creating conditions that are conducive to
long-run per capita income growth. Economic stability,
institution building, and structural reform are at least
as important for long-term development as financial
transfers, important as they are. What matters is the
whole package of policies, financial and technical
assistance, and debt relief if necessary.
Components
of such a package might include:
 |
Macroeconomic
stability to create the right conditions for
investment and saving;
 |
Outward
oriented policies to promote efficiency through
increased trade and investment;
 |
Structural
reform to encourage domestic competition;
 |
Strong
institutions and an effective government to foster
good governance;
 |
Education,
training, and research and development to promote
productivity;
 |
External
debt management to ensure adequate resources for
sustainable development. |
| | | | |
All
these policies should be focussed on country-owned
strategies to reduce poverty by promoting pro-poor
policies that are properly budgeted—including health,
education, and strong social safety nets. A participatory
approach, including consultation with civil society, will
add greatly to their chances of success.
Advanced
economies can make a vital contribution to the low-income
countries’ efforts to integrate into the global economy:
 |
By
promoting trade. One proposal on the table is to
provide unrestricted market access for all exports
from the poorest countries. This should help them move
beyond specialization on primary commodities to
producing processed goods for export.
 |
By
encouraging flows of private capital to the
lower-income countries, particularly foreign direct
investment, with its twin benefits of steady financial
flows and technology transfer.
 |
By
supplementing more rapid debt relief with an increased
level of new financial support. Official development
assistance (ODA) has fallen to 0.24 percent of GDP
(1998) in advanced countries (compared with a UN
target of 0.7 percent). As Michel Camdessus, the
former Managing Director of the IMF put it: "The
excuse of aid fatigue is not credible—indeed it
approaches the level of downright cynicism—at a time
when, for the last decade, the advanced countries have
had the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of the peace
dividend." |
| |
The IMF
supports reform in the poorest countries through its new
Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility. It is contributing
to debt relief through the initiative for the heavily
indebted poor countries.
By


|
|
| |
|
|
©
www.villaggiomondiale.it
- Webmaster: Amedeo Lomonaco
|
|
|
|